I'm not sure how much you can get into the forum's innards, but is there a way for you to create something like the "View posts since last visit" link that doesn't include the Fun Corner? When I go through the latest postings on the forum, I find a huge chunk of the posts are from Fun Corner and I really don't care about what's going on there. Leaving those posts out would make going through new posts muuuch quicker, thanks!

I would love that too... I have nothing against anyone who wants to participate in those threads but I really just come here to read and talk about Scandal

Sometimes it's hard to even find Scandal-related threads while I'm skimming through the new posts. Only other choice is to click into all the individual forums, but that actually takes longer.

nah man, keep th fun corner, just ignore it init, i like reading post from wat i missed and makes my life easy 2 read them,

I'm just asking if we can have a second link that excludes that forum, I'm sure those who participate in Fun Corner's threads would need to know of its new postings.

will c wat the mod says, i say leave it, u can simply ignore it, i ignore most of the threads

I can't do anything on my side, so you'll have to wait for mc~ or yuujin to see if this is possible.

I completely agree though, sometimes when you click that button, the first 2 pages are filled with posts from the Fun Corner.

yea i get wat u mean about bein annoying, but i never clicked on that button, i always click on all the main folder links that im bothered 2 c so i just avoid that ones im not really bothered with, if that made any sense wat so ever

My computer hardware not high tech also my operating system software and my internet connection, but as average user its only takes few second for me to browse to find any thread I specifically want to see through "View posts since last visit". It's so not many participate new post in "Talk".
Just few second browsing before log off SH is already fast enough for me so it must be a lot more faster for "hi tech gadget with smart computer users"

I think this may be a larger problem for me than most because I can probably fix very easily this if I had access to the forum's code.