Star~world96 wrote:And if you're really worrying about them just filling up space, you should think about why Futari is up there.
And yet, I'm much more okay with them including Futari than Take Me Out. Why? Because of the following:
thoseguiltyeyes wrote:
Technically, "Take Me Out" is not out of place and was a necessary move. It has been their only physical single release since YELLOW and hasn't been on an actual original/studio album yet (BEST ALBUM 『SCANDAL』 doesn't count because any best-of album is not an original album), so they're kind of obligated to include it on HONEY. They always put the A-side song of any singles they release onto a studio album.
This also happened with "HARUKAZE," but in a shorter time frame―it was released as a single in February 2012, then on their first best-of album SCANDAL SHOW in March 2012, and then on their 4th studio album Queens are trumps ~Kirifuda wa Queen~ in September 2012. Oh, and if you want to get really technical, also on BEST ALBUM 『SCANDAL』 in February 2017 lol.
I understand that might be a common practice in japanese albums and I didn't know that had already happened with "HARUKAZE" BUT like you said, it was in a shorter time frame. In the case of "Take Me Out", that song is almost a year and a half old. It's kinda funny that its creation is actually closer to the release of "Yellow" than "Honey". And why does that matter to me? As this person says:
Don Dio wrote:Along with the inclusion of "Take Me Out" (even though it is over a year old), "Futari" probably fits well in the context of the overall album and gives the album a consistent flow from start to beginning. I don't think there is a member in this forum that would believe "Yellow" would been a lesser album if the B-side "Flashback No. 5" was included.
Now, I don't know if "Take Me Out" fits sonically with the rest of the album cause it hasn't come out yet, maybe it does, but the fact is "Take Me Out" was created, again, almost a year and a half ago. On the other hand, "Futari" was created in the same time period as the other songs from the new album. To me, that is important because I believe it helps maintain the consistency of the album. Hence why I said it feels out of place. If they really wanted to include it in a studio album, they could have simply put it as a bonus track.
----------------
Don Dio wrote:
As for 10 songs? I love it. One of my biggest complaints since the dawn of the CD age is that albums have gotten too long, and for some bands this meant the inclusion of a few dull tracks so they could pad out to 14 or 15 tunes. If they dropped down to 10 to 12 songs like back in the space-restricted vinyl and tape cassette days, albums would be more consistent and (for me at least) a better listening experience.
Well, I guess that can be the case for Rock music. I actually listen to Rap more than Rock and usually, I prefer the albums to be as long as possible. Think for example, Kendrick Lamar's "To Pimp A Butterfly". The album fills the whole CD and there's not a single filler track in there and it never sounds boring.